含精胺酸飲食配方相較於非含精氨酸飲食是否可促進壓力性損傷病人傷口之癒合Does arginine-enriched oral nutritional supplementation be effective for pressure ulcer wound healing compared to non-arginine formula?

1412 4 110         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2021080014A/Text

2022-05-30 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

蘇翰威* 石琮瑛 廖淑櫻

文章類別

A 類:實證健康照護綜整

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

感染性疾病 (Infectious Diseases)  

治療/介入措施

其他(Others) - 含精胺酸營養配方

專長類別

五官、皮膚及其他護理照護

中文關鍵詞

#壓力性損傷 #精氨酸 #傷口癒合

英文關鍵詞

#pressure injury # arginine # wound healing

機構名稱

臺北市立關渡醫院【委託臺北榮民總醫院經營】

申請單位

A061病房

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
壓力性損傷(Pressure injury)是長期臥床病人常發生的問題,會因此而延長住院時間,也增加死亡風險及醫療成本。照護層面除了基本的傷口照護及疼痛控制,許多照護標準也提及完整的照護模式需有營養措施的介入。針對營養不良或高風險營養不足的壓力性損傷病人,應當接受高熱量、高蛋白的營養補充,而精氨酸是一種人體內必須胺基酸,其本身可促進膠原蛋白合成,促使傷口癒合。因此,臨床上增加攝取含精氨酸的營養補充品是否相較於非含精氨酸飲食是否可促進壓力性損傷傷口癒合,為本文欲探討之主題。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
使用PICO系統性檢索策略,找出核心概念,搜尋PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane library等資料庫,並使用Mesh term關鍵字P(Patient):pressure ulcer, pressure injury、I(Intervention):Arginine、O(Outcomes):wound healing,照布林邏輯AND及OR的方式聯集及交集,搜索限制為2010至2021年且為英文之隨機對照試驗研究(Randomized controlled trial, RCT)及系統性回顧文獻(Systematic Review, SR),符合上述條件文獻共19篇,排除不符合標題文章、排除系統性回顧已納入文章共15篇,納入評讀文獻共4篇。
文獻的品質評讀:
本文採用2010年Oxford之Systematic Review Appraisal Sheet進行2篇SR文獻評讀,以RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet進行2篇RCT文獻評讀,再依據2010年牛津實證醫學中心證據等級進行評比,證據等級兩篇Systematic Review皆為level 1,兩篇RCT皆為level 2。Cereda, Neyens, et al. (2017)統合分析呈現二~四級壓力性損傷病人,每天2-3次增加口服或管灌精氨酸(每份含3 至8.5克)、鋅及抗氧化物的飲食配方,使用至第八週,壓力性損傷面積明顯減少(MD = -15.7%,95%CI-29.9~ -1.5,P = 0.03, I2 = 58.6%)、壓力性損傷面積減少40%以上的比例是對照組的1.72倍(OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04 ~ 2.84, P = 0.033, I2 = 0%)。Schneider和Yahia (2019)每天補充4.5至9克精氨酸,持續時間為3至12週,相較於非含精氨酸能量足夠之飲食配方者,傷口癒合明顯改善。Wong et al. (2014)使用含精氨酸飲食配方一週後,活組織達71.11%,較基礎值顯著增加28.3% (95% CI, 7.5 ~ 49.2, p = 0.007);使用兩週後,活組織增加43.1% (95% CI, 20.7 ~ 65.4, p < 0.001),顯著高於對照組的25.93% (p=0.02)。
結果、結論與建議:
綜合四篇文獻,足夠的營養補充對傷口癒合具相當重要性、含精胺酸飲食配方對具有二~四級壓力性損傷病人之傷口癒合有顯著成效。臨床上除了提供最完善的傷口照護,及時提供高熱量及高蛋白並添加精氨酸,更有利傷口癒合、減少照護總成本。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
A pressure injury is a common issue among bedridden patients. It will cause prolong the length of stays, increase the mortality rate, and also increase the medical cost. Wound caring and pain control are both the basic treatments for these patients. However, many clinical practice guidelines mention that the intervention of nutrition support is also quite important. If patients suffer malnutrition or are at high risk of malnutrition, the caring policies for them should include taking high calories and high protein diet treatments. Besides this, according to the research, the formula contained arginine, one kind of essential amino acid in human beings, can promote the synthesis of collagen, which can boost the healing of wounds. Based on this, the purpose of this study is to review if the arginine supplement could improve the healing of wounds sufficiently or not?
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
This study used the empirical method to set the PICO keyword, combines and intersects the keywords in the way of Buhlin logic AND and OR. Keywords are pressure ulcer, pressure injury, Arginine, wound healing. The database included PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane library, limited 2010 to 2021 and English language. There were 19 System Review (SR), and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) found. During the process, there were 15 articles deleted because of the incompatible topics and abstracts. After all, four articles remained included two systematic reviews and two randomized controlled trials were selected.
Critical Appraisal:
The author independently critically appraised selected studies by the following methods. First, as the two System Review articles, we used Oxford’s Systematic Review Appraisal Sheet to appraise. And the other two RCT articles, we used RCT Critical Appraisal Sheet to appraise, using the Oxford center for EBM(2010) to evaluate. Both System Review articles are level one, and the other two RCT articles are level two. Cereda, Neyens, et al. (2017) meta-analyzed that using arginine (3 to 8.5 gram each formula), zinc, and anti-oxidant formula by oral or feeding form on those who had stage 2-4 pressure injury for two to three times a day till the eight weeks, the area of pressure injury wound decreases apparently (MD = -15.7%,95%CI-29.9~ -1.5,P = 0.03, I2 = 58.6%) and having a 40% or greater reduction in PU size (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.04 ~ 2.84, P = 0.033, I2 = 0%) compared to the result of the group with regular diet. Schneider & Yahia (2019) stated that supplement 4.5-9.0 grams arginine for 3-12 weeks had better healing of pressure injury wound than non-arginine formula. Wong et al. (2014) stated after 1 week of supplementation, the rate of the viable tissues in the experimental group were 71.11%, a statistically significant increase of 28.3% (95% CI, 7.5 to 49.2, p=0.007), and after 2 weeks the viable tissues increase to 43.1% from baseline (95% CI, 20.7 to 65.4, p<0.001), higher than the control group 25.93% (p=0.02).
Results, Conclusions and Recommendations:
In summary, the importance of sufficient supplements to wound healing is certain, and arginine supplements has efficacy of the pressure ulcer wound healing especially. Practically, in addition to best wound care, providing high calories and high protein diet, plus arginine formula, can better help the healing of the wound.