穴位刺激改善慢性阻塞性肺病之肺功能、運動耐力及生活品質:系統性文獻回顧及統合分析Acupoint stimulation on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1319 3 181         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2022030030A/Text

2022-09-12 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

謝佳霖 楊婷珺 宋柔郁 鍾美玲 葉美玲*

文章類別

A 類:實證健康照護綜整

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

胸腔暨重症加護醫學 (Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine)  

治療/介入措施

其他(Others) - 穴位刺激

專長類別

傳統與輔助醫療

中文關鍵詞

#慢性阻塞性肺病 #穴位刺激 #肺功能 #運動耐力 #生活品質

英文關鍵詞

#Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease # acupoint stimulation # pulmonary function # exercise capacity # quality of life

機構名稱

國立臺北護理健康大學

申請單位

護理系

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
世界衛生組織預測慢性阻塞性肺疾於2030年將會是全球第三大死因。中醫穴位刺激可輔助改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病人的呼吸功能,但缺乏系統性文獻回顧探討整體成效。因此,本研究採用系統性文獻回顧與統合分析來確認穴位刺激是否能改善慢性肺疾病人之肺功能、運動耐力及生活品質。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
依據實證護理五大步驟,首先以PICO 架構設定關鍵字及同義字,P:「慢性阻塞性肺病、chronic obstructive pulmonary disease」;I:「穴位刺激、acupuncture」;O:「肺功能、pulmonary function test、運動耐力、exercise capacity 、 六分鐘走路距離、six-minute walk distance、生活品質、quality of life」。繼而,以布林運算元AND、OR在六個中英文電子資料庫搜尋,包括CINAHL、PubMed 、Cochrance Library、Embase、華藝及中國知識基礎工程。最後,獲得125篇文獻,接著篩選10年內的隨機控制試驗,再排除不符合納入條件,共計有5篇隨機控制試驗文章。
文獻的品質評讀:
文獻品質評讀分析由三人以考科藍團隊修改的偏差風險評估(revised tool for Cochrane Risk of Bias, RoB 2.0)獨立進行文獻評讀。評讀結果顯示,5篇文獻的流失率均在可接受範圍內,且未出現選擇性報告,然而5篇文獻皆未說明結果評估是否有盲化。繼而以Review Manager(RevMan 5.4)軟體進行統合分析。分析結果顯示,穴位刺激後,慢性阻塞性肺疾病人可增加肺功能之第一秒用力呼氣量百分比預測值及第一秒用力呼氣量,並改善運動耐力及生活品質。
結果、結論與建議:
實證文獻回顧與統合分析結果支持穴位刺激能改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病人的肺功能、運動耐力及生活品質。惟因篇數較少,轉譯於臨床運用尚需謹慎,未來也需要研究品質更佳的研究。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
The World Health Organization (WHO) has predicted that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) will become the third global leading cause of death by 2030. Although acupoint stimulation, a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) technique, can help improve the respiratory function of patients with COPD, its overall efficacy has not been extensively discussed by systematic reviews. Therefore, this study utilized a systematic review and meta-analysis to verify the efficacy of acupoint stimulation in improving the lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with COPD.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
Based on the five steps of evidence-based nursing, the study first determined keywords and their synonyms in the PICO framework, with P representing “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” I representing “acupoint stimulation, acupuncture,” and O representing “pulmonary function, pulmonary function test, and “quality of life.” Subsequently, the Boolean operators AND and OR were used to search for the keywords in six Chinese and English electronic databases, namely CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Airiti Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). The search ended with 125 studies, which were further screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted within the last decade. After studies that failed to meet the inclusion criteria were excluded, five RCTs were eventually included.
Critical Appraisal:
Critical appraisal was independently reviewed by three reviewers who used the revised tool for Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) developed by the Cochrane collaboration. Results indicated that the attrition rates of all five included RCTs were acceptable, and there was no selective reporting. However, none of the five RCTs stated whether the evaluation results were blinded. Next, the Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software was adopted for meta-analysis, which suggested that acupoint stimulation not only increased both the forced expiratory volume in one-second percentage predicted (FEV1% pre) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of patients with COPD but also improved their exercise tolerance and QoL.
Results, Conclusions and Recommendations:
The results of systematic review and meta-analysis supported the evidence that acupoint stimulation could improve the lung function, exercise tolerance, and QoL of patients with COPD. However, due to the small number of RCTs reviewed by this study, the clinical application of the conclusion should be approached with caution. In addition, further studies with better research quality are required.