Semaglutide對於非糖尿病之肥胖患者的減重效果The effect of the semaglutide for loss weight in obese patients without diabetes

45 0 21

2024-04-25 已刊登
新刊登 綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

魏志穎 邵聖雅 王柏權 王柏予*

文章類別

A 類:實證健康照護綜整

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

內分泌與糖尿病 (Endocrinology and Diabetes)  家庭醫學 (Family Medicine and General Practice)  

治療/介入措施

其他(Others) - 臨床藥物治療成效

專長類別

消化、內分泌

中文關鍵詞

#第一型類升糖素胜肽受體致效劑 #腸泌素 #胰妥讚 #非糖尿病肥胖 #減重

英文關鍵詞

#Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1-RA) #Incretin #Semaglutide #Non-diabetic obesity #Weight Loss

機構名稱

新北市立土城醫院【委託長庚醫療財團法人興建經營】

申請單位

護理部

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
Semaglutide是一個長效glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist,已證實可用於控制糖尿病患者體重,而Semaglutide是否對非糖尿病患者有減重效果仍需確認,因此我們提出一個臨床問題:「Semaglutide對於非糖尿病之肥胖患者的減重是否有效?」
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
根據前述臨床問題形成PICO,於PubMed、Embase、Cochrane library和CEPS華藝中文電子資料庫進行文獻搜尋,再選定符合本主題與PICO之系統性文獻回顧暨統合分析之文章,使用Critical Appraisal Skill Program(CASP)進行文獻品質評讀,再根據牛津大學實證醫學中心證據分類標準及Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE)證據等級評估系統進行證據等級評估。
文獻的品質評讀:
最終篩選出兩篇隨機臨床試驗之系統性文獻回顧及統合分析,使用CASP進行文獻信度、重要性及臨床適用性進行品質評讀。根據牛津大學實證醫學中心證據分類標準為Level 1,再以GRADE評估證據品質。評讀後,Arastu等(2022)為中度證據品質,Tan等(2022)為高度證據品質。研究結果顯示使用Semaglutide可顯著降低體重、腰圍及身體質量指數(Body Mass Index, BMI)。
結果、結論與建議:
非糖尿病患者使用Semaglutide亦可顯著降低體重、腰圍及身體質量指數。此外,每週施打之頻率,相較於每日施打,可提高藥物使用遵從性;但此藥在減重方面仍屬較新穎的方式,故仍需要更長時間與更多隨機臨床試驗研究來確認Semaglutie對慢性肥胖的影響。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Semaglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, is administered weekly to manage body weight in diabetic patients. Yet, its efficacy in inducing weight loss among non-diabetic individuals remains to be established. This prompts the clinical inquiry: "Does semaglutide contribute to weight reduction in obese patients who do not have diabetes?"
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
In addressing the clinical question posited, we formulated a PICO framework and undertook an exhaustive literature search across PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the CEPS Airiti Chinese Electronic Database. Subsequently, we meticulously identified and selected systematic reviews and meta-analyses that aligned with our defined topic and PICO criteria. The assessment of the literature's quality was rigorously conducted using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), ensuring a thorough evaluation of the evidence. Furthermore, we executed an evidence grading assessment utilizing the evidence classification standards set by the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, in conjunction with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) evidence grading system. This comprehensive approach allowed us to evaluate and classify the evidence meticulously, facilitating a structured and nuanced analysis of the literature in question.
Critical Appraisal:
The final selection process yielded two systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, which were subjected to a rigorous quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) to assess their credibility, relevance, and clinical applicability. According to the evidence classification standards of the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, they were deemed Level 1 evidence. The GRADE system was applied, categorizing the study by Arastu et al. (2022) as moderate quality of evidence, and the study by Tan et al. (2022) as high quality of evidence. The research outcomes indicate that semaglutide significantly reduces body weight, waist circumference, and Body Mass Index (BMI) in obese patients who do not suffer from diabetes.
Results, Conclusions and Recommendations:
In non-diabetic patients, the administration of Semaglutide has been significantly associated with reductions in body weight, waist circumference, and Body Mass Index. The once-weekly dosing regimen of Semaglutide enhances medication adherence when compared to daily dosing, presenting a notable advancement for patients with historically poor adherence. However, as a relatively novel approach to weight reduction, the long-term impact of Semaglutide on chronic obesity necessitates further validation through extended research and an increased number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).