使用產球緩解初產婦待產疼痛之實證照護應用Evidence-Based Care Application of Birthing Ball for Relieving Labor Pain in Primiparous Women

446 2 94

2025-02-13 已刊登
新刊登 綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

陳韻如* 王文燕 林金燕 鄭麗華 謝芳貴 張綺紋

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

婦產科與婦女健康 (Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health)  

治療/介入措施

臨床護理技術相關措施(Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques) - 使用產球

專長類別

婦兒及家庭

中文關鍵詞

#初產婦 #產球 #產痛

英文關鍵詞

# Primiparity #delivery ball #labor pain

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人基隆長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

產房

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
疼痛是待產過程中最常見的護理問題,減緩疼痛的方式多樣,其中產球是一種非侵入性且安全的工具,使用產球不僅有助於放鬆骨盆區域,促進胎頭下降,但是否能緩解待產過程中的疼痛尚無定論。本文採實證方法確認提供產球是否能減緩初產婦待產疼痛,並於臨床實踐。臨床問題族群(Population)為初產婦、介入措施(Intervention)為使用產球、比較措施(Comparison)為常規護理、結果指標(Outcome)為待產過程中的疼痛程度。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
(一)文獻檢索資料庫包含:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, 及CEPS中文電子期刊資料庫。 (二)關鍵字包含:Population(Primiparity, Primigravida, Primipara, Pregnancy, Labor*, Delivery, Obstetric, 初產婦, 待產婦)、Intervention(birth ball, peanut ball, 產球)、Outcome(labor pain, delivery pain, 疼痛)。以布林邏輯「AND」交集P及I之關鍵字、MeSH term及text words進行搜尋,並使用Truncation*,限制語言為中英文。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
初步搜尋結果共150篇,扣除重複文獻26篇、標題摘要不符合主題95篇及無全文可瀏覽的20篇,最終納入2篇系統性回顧(Systematic Review; SR)進行評讀。以2018年版的CASP Systematic Review Checklist作為評讀工具,依據Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine(OCEBM)分級標準標準,兩篇文獻研究證據等級均判定為Level I。證據顯示,在第一產程活躍期採趴、坐、夾產球之舒適臥位可降低待產時的平均疼痛分數分別為1.46分(95%信賴區間 -2.15, -0.76; p < 0.00001)及1.70分(95%信賴區間 -2.20, -1.20; p = 0.003)。
證據之臨床應用:
運用實證知識轉譯7步驟,自2021年2月1日至2021年3月31日,於北部某區域教學醫院產房收案,招募對象為初產婦,採立意取樣,排除剖腹產、使用止痛藥物及無陪伴者。實驗組在子宮頸口擴張在4至8 cm時,除常規護理包括按摩、熱敷或使用止痛藥物之外,再使用趴或坐姿配合產球的舒適臥位;控制組則接受常規護理包括按摩、熱敷或使用止痛藥物。結果指標疼痛程度以數字等級量表(Numerical Rating Scale; NRS,0-10分)進行評分,分數越高表示越疼痛。實驗組在產球介入後,控制組在常規護理介入後,皆於30、60、90分鐘測量一次疼痛分數,以比較兩組疼痛緩解效果。
成效評值:
本案共招募19名初產婦,實驗組11人、對照組8人,兩組在平均年齡與妊娠週數等基本資料均無統計學上顯著差異。實驗組感到疼痛便開始使用產球,在使用產球的30分鐘後,實驗組的疼痛分數較對照組高0.58分,但無統計學上顯著差異(t = 1.394; 95% CI: -0.3 ~ 1.46; p = 0.181)。然而,在給予產球後60分鐘與90分鐘後,實驗組疼痛分數顯著減緩,分別比對照組降低1.51分(t = -4.923; 95% CI: -2.16 ~ -0.86; p = 0.001)及2.05分(t = -3.355; 95% CI: -3.18 ~ -0.73; p = 0.004),顯示使用產球後的60分鐘與90分鐘可以顯著緩解待產疼痛。
結論與建議:
產球為非侵入性措施、不需額外自費,且待產期間在護理師的指導下,操作安全簡易,廣受初產婦及家屬好評。為進一步推廣產球使用,本團隊已著手製作產球使用的衛教影片,期望待產婦及家屬能夠反覆觀看學習,以提升產球使用的推廣效率,進而造福更多待產婦,讓她們在待產期間有更舒適且有效緩解疼痛的正向生產經驗。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Pain is the most common care issue during childbirth. There are various ways to reduce pain, among which a birthing ball is a non-invasive and safe tool. Using a birthing ball not only helps relax the expectant mother’s pelvic area but also helps the baby’s head descend through the birth canal. However, whether using a birthing ball can ease pain during labor remains underexplored. This study used an empirical approach to determine whether providing a birthing ball can ease labor pain in primiparas and to apply it to clinical practice. The study population was primiparas, and the intervention involved using a birthing ball. We compared the usual care to measure the outcome of pain levels during labor.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
(1) Literature search databases included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CEPS (Chinese Electronic Periodical Services). (2) Keywords included: population (primiparity, primigravida, primipara, pregnancy, labor*, delivery, obstetrics, primipara, pregnant women), intervention (birthing ball, peanut ball, a birthing ball), outcome (labor pain, delivery pain, pain). This study used Boolean logic “AND” for the intersection of P and I to search for keywords, MeSH terms, and text words. We used truncation* to restrict the languages to Chinese and English.
Critical Appraisal:
The initial search elicited 150 articles. After removing 26 duplicate articles, there were 95 articles whose titles and abstracts did not match the topic and 20 articles without full texts for browsing. As such, this study conducted two systematic reviews (SR) for evaluation. We used the CASP Systematic Review Checklist (2018) as an evaluation tool. Based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM), the evidence level of both SRs was determined to be Level I. The results showed that lying down/sitting and holding a birthing ball in a comfortable lying position during the first active stage of labor can reduce the average pain score during labor by 1.46 points (95% confidence interval -2.15, -0.76; p < 0.00001) and 1.70 points (95% CI -2.20, -1.20; p = 0.003), respectively.
Clinical Application of Evidence:
This study used the seven steps of empirical knowledge translation. We recruited primiparas from the delivery room at a regional teaching hospital in northern Taiwan from February 1, 2021 to March 31, 2021 as the subjects. This study used purposive sampling and excluded pregnant women who underwent cesarean section, used pain medication, or had no companion in the delivery room. When participants in the experimental group had their cervix dilated between 4 and 8 cm, in addition to usual care, including massage, warm compress, or analgesics, participants were placed in a comfortable lying position to hold a birthing ball in a lying down or sitting position. The control group only received usual care, including massage, warm compress, or analgesics. The outcome measure (pain level) was scored using a numerical rating scale (NRS; 0­ to 10 points), with higher scores indicating more severe pain. The experimental group received the birthing ball intervention, while the control group received usual care. Post-intervention, pain scores were measured at 30, 60, and 90 minutes in both groups to compare the pain relief effects between the two groups.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
This study enrolled 19 primiparas, 11 in the experimental group and eight in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding basic data such as mean age and gestational weeks. The experimental group began using birthing balls when they felt pain. After 30 minutes of using a birthing ball, the pain score of the experimental group was 0.58 points higher than that of the control group, but there was no statistically significant difference (t = 1.394; 95% CI: - 0.3 ~ 1.46; p = 0.181). However, after 60 and 90 minutes of using a birthing ball, the pain scores of the experimental group were significantly reduced, which were 1.51 points (t = -4.923; 95% CI: -2.16 ~ -0.86; p = 0.001) and 2.05 points lower than those of the control group, respectively (t = -3.355; 95% CI: -3.18 ~ -0.73; p = 0.004). This finding suggests that using a birthing ball significantly relieved labor pain after 60 and 90 minutes.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
The birthing ball is a non-invasive measure, and the participants did not need to pay any extra fee for using it. Under the nurse's guidance during delivery, the operation skill of a birthing ball is safe and straightforward, which is widely praised by primiparas and their families. To further promote the use of a birthing ball, this research has led to the production of a health education video on using a birthing ball. The aim is for expectant mothers and their families to watch the video repeatedly to learn the operation skills and to improve the promotion efficiency of using a birthing ball. We suggest that using a birthing ball can benefit pregnant women by giving them a more comfortable and effective labor pain relief experience during the delivery period.