園藝治療是否可改善思覺失調症病人壓力及焦慮程度?Does horticultural therapy improve anxiety and stress among patients with schizophrenia ?

3276 6 465         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2021060003B/Text

2021-12-24 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

李宜玟 陳其嶸* 林秀玲 許瓊華 金玉華

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

精神醫學 (Psychiatry)  

治療/介入措施

其他(Others) - 園藝治療

專長類別

精神衛生護理

中文關鍵詞

#園藝治療 #思覺失調症 #壓力 #焦慮

英文關鍵詞

#Horticultural therapy # Schizophrenia # Stress # Anxiety

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人高雄長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

精神科日間留院

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
思覺失調症病人除了受精神症狀干擾外,常會因壓力、焦慮而出現情緒困擾,甚至自殺傾向。園藝治療以種植植物為媒介,讓病人學習自我調適壓力。因此,本方案形成之臨床問題為園藝治療(Intervention)是否可改善思覺失調症病人(Patient)焦慮及壓力程度(Outcome)?
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
依實證護理5A步驟進行,於Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL與華藝線上圖書館等資料庫搜尋2020年4月前的文獻。作者依PICO設定關鍵字與相應的控制語彙,並搭配適當的布林邏輯進行搜尋。納入條件為: (1)系統性回顧或隨機對照試驗、(2)收錄18歲以上思覺失調症病人、(3)以園藝治療為介入方案等、(4)以焦慮、壓力為結果評量。總計1篇系統性文獻回顧及1篇隨機對照試驗符合條件納入評讀。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
依照文章類型,使用CASP文獻檢核表進行評讀,並以SIGN 評估文獻之證據等級與推薦等級。兩篇文獻評讀結果分別為證據等級1+之系統性回顧與1-之隨機對照試驗,證據體之推薦等級為B。
證據之臨床應用:
參考評讀文獻之介入方案,作者擬定園藝治療活動,並將符合收案條件之思覺失調症病人,隨機分派分為實驗組(n=21)及對照組(n=21),實驗組病人介入每週2次,每次80分鐘,持續4週,共計640分鐘之園藝治療活動,而對照組則維持一般常規活動,所有受試者皆進行前測與後測評量。
成效評值:
實驗組在前測時較對照組有較高的焦慮症狀(t=2.053, p=.047)及壓力症狀(t=2.613, p=.013);介入後,共變數分析結果於組別主要效應達顯著差異,實驗組於焦慮(F=8.542, p=.006, η2=.180)及壓力(F=6.506, p=.015, η2=.143)有較多改善並有高度效果值。在臨床成功案例上,實驗改善焦慮程度之勝算比為7.13(95%CI: 1.31–38.77),NNT為3(95%CI: 1.7–11.5);改善壓力程度之勝算比為10.00 (95%CI: 1.10–90.59),NNT為4(95%CI: 2.0–15.5)。
結論與建議:
本文將實證轉譯於臨床,執行園藝治療活動以改善情緒問題,結果支持以園藝治療之方式介入可改善思覺失調症病人壓力及焦慮程度,建議未來可持續應用於臨床個案,並採更大樣本、更嚴謹之研究設計進一步驗證於不同結果評量之效益。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Patients with schizophrenia exhibit psychotic symptoms, and are more vulnerable to stress and anxiety, leading to mood disturbance or even suicidal tendencies. Through the process of planting, horticultural therapy can help patients learn self-management and stress coping skills. Therefore, the clinical question of the current program was as follows: Does horticultural therapy (Intervention) improve anxiety and stress (Outcome) among patients with schizophrenia (Patient)?
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
The programs were based on the EBN 5A steps. A literature search was conducted on the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and CEPS from inception to April 2020. We set the key words and accompanying MeSH terms, performing a search with proper Boolean logic. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials. (2) Patients with schizophrenia aged over 18 years (3) Application of horticultural therapy. (4) Outcome measures included anxiety or stress. One systematic review and one randomized controlled trial met the criteria.
Critical Appraisal:
According to the study design, the included studies were critically appraised with the CASP critical appraisal checklists. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was based on the SIGN guidelines. The level of evidence of the included studies was rated as 1+ for the systematic review, and 1- for the randomized controlled trials, respectively. Thus the body of evidence resulted in grade B recommendation.
Clinical Application of Evidence:
Referencing the literature, the authors designed horticultural therapy programs. Patients with schizophrenia, who met the inclusion criteria, were recruited and randomly allocated to the experimental (n=21) or control (n=21) groups. The patients in the experimental group received horticultural therapy sessions for 80 minutes, twice weekly, for 4 weeks. The total length of intervention was 640 minutes. The patients in the control condition continued their usual care. All participants were evaluated at baseline and post-intervention.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
At baseline, the experimental group had higher anxiety (t=2.053, p=.047) and stress (t=2.613, p=.013) than the control group. After intervention, ANCOVA revealed a significant main effect on group; the experimental group exhibited a greater improvement in anxiety (F=8.542, p=.006, η2=.180) and stress (F=6.506, p=.015, η2=.143), with large effect size. As for clinical success, the experimental group had more successful cases regarding anxiety, with an odds ratio of 7.13 (95%CI:1.31–38.77) and NNT of 3 (95%CI:1.7–11.5). For improvement of stress, the odds ratio was 10.000 (95%CI:1.10–90.59), favoring the experimental group, and NNT was 4 (95%CI:2.0–15.5).
Conclusions and Recommendations:
This report exemplifies knowledge translation from evidence to practice. The authors applied horticultural therapy to address mood disturbance. The results provide support for the execution of horticultural therapy on anxiety and stress among patients with schizophrenia. We recommend application of such programs continuously. However, future research with a larger sample size, more rigorous study design, and exploration of different outcomes of interest is warranted.