返校計劃是否能支持癌症兒童回校的適應及改善其憂鬱程度Can Return-to-School Programs Support the Adaptation and Improve the Incidence of Depression in Children with Cancer When Returning to School?

867 3 145         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2021100025B/Text

2022-06-01 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

洪嘉玟* 洪金燕 留英珊 游于涵

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

兒科醫學 (Pediatrics)  

治療/介入措施

心理教育相關措施(Psycho-educational Intervention) - 返校計畫

專長類別

婦兒及家庭

中文關鍵詞

#返校計劃、癌症兒童、憂鬱發生率

英文關鍵詞

#Return-to-school programs # children with cancer # incidence of depression

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人高雄長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

護理部

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
癌症兒童重返學校與同儕社交互動有助於他們的積極適應;然而因疾病影響,認知、身體外觀變化及缺課承受學業的負擔,與同儕互動關係不佳,長久下造成憂鬱及情緒低下等問題導致學業中斷,專家提出返校計畫能幫助癌症兒童重新返回學校和社會適應,對兒童的康復效益佳。然而臨床癌症兒童的返校後的憂鬱發生率有13.2%,故在治療期間運用返校計劃是否能支持兒童接受教育及改善返校後的憂鬱情緒。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
將臨床問題整理提出PICO, Patient/Population: 癌症兒童(Child* cancer/ Neoplasms),Intervention: 返校計畫(School* reentry /Return to school),Outcome:憂鬱發生率/程度(Incidence of depression / levels of depression)。運用布林邏輯,以Mesh Terms進行資料庫搜尋,搜尋Cochrane Library、ClinicalKey Nursing、PubMed、Embase及華藝線上圖書館(CEPS)等,並使用”limit”及”Filters”檢索功能,因問題為治療型問題,故搜尋主要以SR、RCT 及Meta-Analysis文章為主,最後納入一篇Meta-Analysis文章進行評讀。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
文章以CASP(2018)的SR評核表進行評讀,並依據Oxford 2011年實證等級評定為Level 1。但運用GRADE證據品質表評分,文獻中六篇研究報告僅一篇為隨機對照研究(RCTs),且因返校計畫無法盲化,存在執行偏差,故將證據等級評定為弱。但因返校計畫無風險問題,癌症病童能有效降低憂鬱發生程度,且家長-校方-醫院都看重返校計畫的執行及效益,也無成本問題,故建議強度分級為中。
證據之臨床應用:
依實證文獻結果擬定具體的返校計畫介入措施為:一、貼心關懷-提供病童/家屬返校照護手冊;二、超前佈署-進行病童遊戲化的情緒輔導;三、面面俱到-舉辦返校會議及提供教師相關資訊;四、專業管理-返校個案管理模式及返校照護標準化流程。
成效評值:
返校計畫介入6個月內,對返回學校就讀的10位癌症病童進行憂鬱發生率調查,其返校後一個月憂鬱發生率降至0%,持續追蹤三個月仍維持0%,自我概念低下發生率維持0%,父母親職壓力發生率降至0%。醫護人員執行返校準備的衛教執行率能達100%,癌症病童出院後上課出席率維持100%,家長對照護指導滿意度達100%,學校老師的滿意度高達100%。且於門診追蹤時以質性訪談病童與家屬,表示與同學的互動很好,也交到好朋友;老師會關心學業及身體適應狀況,家長也表示能放心病童的學校生活。
結論與建議:
結合兒童癌症照護團隊合作,以實證文獻結果,運用品管圈推動返校策略改善病童的憂鬱發生率,說明返校計畫有效且維護兒童的受教育權利,對其身心發展有助益。並於主管的支持下持續收案以強化資料的完整性,建議能將收案對象擴大至其他醫院,可增加資料的豐富性及多元性,方使成果更具效益,促進癌症病童最佳照護效益。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
School reentry is a vital recovery process for children with cancer to get back into standard routine and social interaction. However, due to the influence of illness, changes in cognition or physical appearance, and absence from the classes, poor interaction with peers, resulting in depression and leaving the school. The incidence of depression in children with clinical cancer after returning to school is 13.2%. Therefore, whether applying for the return-to-school programs during treatment can improve their depression condition when returning to school.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
The clinical questions were analyzed and put into PICO, Patient/Population: Child* cancer/ Neoplasms, Intervention: School* reentry /Return to school, Outcome: Incidence of depression / levels of depression). Using Boolean Logic to search the database within Cochrane Library, ClinicalKey Nursing, PubMed, Embase, and Huayi Online Library (CEPS), etc., and use the "limit" and "Filters" search functions, and finally a Meta-Analysis article was included for appraisal.
Critical Appraisal:
The article was evaluated based on the CASP (2018) SR evaluation form and rated as Level 1 based on Oxford 2011 empirical rating. However, when using the Grade -Evidence Quality Scale score, the return-to-school programs could not be blinded, there were implement biases, the level of evidence was rated as weak. On the other hand, due to back-to-school programs being risk-free, children with cancer could effectively reduce the degree of depression by attending programs, so the recommended strength is “medium.
Clinical Application of Evidence:
Based on the results of the empirical literature, the specific intervention measures for the return-to-school programs are as follows: 1. Provide a handbook of return-to-school for sick children/family members; 2. Conduct emotional counseling with gamification for cancer children; 3. Arrange return-to-school meetings for providing teachers with relevant information; 4. Set standardized return-to-school case management model.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
Within six months of the return-to-school program, ten children with cancer had tested, the incidence of depression dropped to 0% after returning to school for one month. The incidence of low self-concept remained at 0%. and parental stress was reduced to 0%. The implementation rate of health education for medical staff to prepare for returning to school could reach 100%, after discharge from the hospital, the attendance rate remained at 100%, and the satisfaction of parents with nursing guidance reached100%, and the satisfaction of school teachers were as high as 100%. During the outpatient follow-up, the children and their families were interviewed qualitatively. They expressed that they interacted well with their classmates and made good friends. The teachers would care about their academic and physical adaptation, and parents also expressed confidence in the school life of children.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
According to empirical literature results, cooperating the children's cancer care teams and using quality control circles to promote return-to-school planning strategies to reduce the incidence of depression of cancer children indicates. The result had shown that the return-to-school programs were an effective way to protect children's right to education and preserve their physical and mental health benefits.