運用智慧型手機是否能提升大腸鏡腸道準備之成效?Can the use of smartphones improve the effectiveness of bowel preparation for colonoscopy?

286 0 163

2025-02-27 已刊登
新刊登 綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

鍾淑韻* 吳珮琪 謝盈綺 陳冠伶

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

一般外科醫學 (General Surgery)  

治療/介入措施

其他(Others) - 應用程式通訊軟體

專長類別

消化、內分泌

中文關鍵詞

#大腸鏡檢查、智慧型手機、腸道準備

英文關鍵詞

#Colonoscopy、Smartphone、Bowel Preparation

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人高雄長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

門診二組

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
本單位為醫學中心大腸直肛科門診,隨著國民健康署所提供的大腸癌篩檢陽性個案的增加,時常面對病患需做大腸鏡而求診,腸道的清潔程度是會最直接影響大腸鏡的檢查結果,目前由於大腸鏡檢查前的腸道準備與檢查成效影響因素很多,對大多數病患而言最擔心的還是繁瑣的檢查前的腸道準備,歐洲內視鏡協會建議加強對病患進行腸道準備的衛教,除了傳統的口頭衛教,還有一些增強型的衛教,包括視覺輔助工具(影片或衛教單張)、社交軟體、電話或短信服務和智慧型手機應用程式等,故引發作者希望藉由實證文獻及臨床應用研究探討運用智慧型手機是否能提升大腸鏡腸道準備之成效,以訂定日後衛教措施與策略,促進照護品質。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
運用 MeSH term 搜尋以P、I、C、O 不同拼法關鍵字及同義字,並使用 limit 檢索功能,運用布林邏輯進行各實證資料庫搜尋PubMed、Embase、 ClinicalKey Nursing、Cochrane Library和華藝線上圖書館-中文電子期刊資料庫(CEPS)等資料庫,並運用filters及limit檢索功能選擇RCT、SR及Meta-Analysis文章,不限定年份及語言類型,最初122篇,刪除重複、非PICO及排除條件後,最後篩選一篇隨機對照試驗及一篇系統性分析文獻。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
依據文獻評估工具採用Critical Appraisal Skill Programme(CASP)之最新系統性文獻回顧檢核表(2018)及隨機控制試驗檢核表CASP(2020)分別進行有效性、重要性及應用性三大面向的評讀,結果評定“Yes”的%各分別為,隨機對照試驗文獻(RCT)90%、系統性文獻(SR) 90%。兩篇文獻評讀證據等級參考牛津大學實證醫學中心Oxford CEBM(2011)建議的臨床研究證據等級及彙整結果評定為Level I。
證據之臨床應用:
依據文獻統整建議擬定實證方案,採方便取樣納入50歲至70歲大腸鏡病患,分為實驗組及對照組,於檢查前三天透過LINE官方社群發送訊息給實驗組,於2024年5月6日至5月30日執行,共60名病患參與,並以Aronchick scale 量表來評估病患腸道清潔程度。
成效評值:
介入措施後結果顯示,實驗組較對照組之腸道清潔效果佳,並達顯著差異(p=0.042),顯示介入措施能提升大腸鏡腸道準備之成效。
結論與建議:
本研究以實證文獻探討「運用智慧型手機是否能提升大腸鏡腸道準備之成效」,依實證整合結果與本臨床應用結果顯示,利用智慧型手機進行強化衛生教育具備可行性,方便快捷、不受時間地點限制又可隨時觀看,實為經濟實惠之衛教策略。擬將相關作業修訂於門診之工作規範,達成實證知識轉譯,落實科學證據於護理臨床實務與推展的目的。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Our department is the Colorectal Surgery Outpatient Clinic at a medical center. With the increase in positive cases of colorectal cancer screening provided by the National Health Agency, we frequently encounter patients who require colonoscopies. The cleanliness of the bowel directly affects the results of the colonoscopy. Currently, the preparation of the bowel before a colonoscopy and the factors influencing the effectiveness of the examination are numerous. For most patients, their main concern is the complicated bowel preparation process before the procedure. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends enhancing patient education on bowel preparation. In addition to traditional oral education, there are also enhanced educational methods, including visual aids (videos or educational pamphlets), social media, phone or text services, and smartphone applications. This has inspired the author to explore through evidence-based literature and clinical research whether the use of smartphones can improve the effectiveness of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, with the aim of developing future educational measures and strategies to promote care quality.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
Using MeSH terms to search with different spellings and synonyms for P, I, C, O keywords, and applying the limit search function, we conducted searches across various evidence-based databases, including PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey Nursing, Cochrane Library, and the Airiti Library (CEPS-Chinese Electronic Periodical Services). Boolean logic was employed during the search process. Filters and the limit search function were used to select RCTs, SRs, and Meta-Analysis articles, with no restrictions on the year or language. Initially, 122 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, non-PICO studies, and applying exclusion criteria, one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and one systematic review article were finally selected.
Critical Appraisal:
Based on the literature evaluation tools, the latest Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) checklists for systematic reviews (2018) and randomized controlled trials (2020) were used to assess the effectiveness, significance, and applicability of the studies. The percentage of studies rated "Yes" for these aspects was 90% for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 90% for systematic reviews (SRs). The evidence levels of both studies were evaluated according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) 2011 guidelines and were rated as Level I.
Clinical Application of Evidence:
Based on the recommendations from the literature, an evidence-based plan was developed. Convenient sampling was used to include colonoscopy patients aged 50 to 70 years, divided into an experimental group and a control group. Three days prior to the examination, messages were sent to the experimental group via an official LINE community. The study will be conducted from May 6 to May 30, 2024, with a total of 60 patients participating. The Aronchick scale will be used to assess the patients' bowel cleanliness.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
Results after the intervention showed that the experimental group had better bowel cleanliness compared to the control group, with a significant difference (p=0.042), indicating that the intervention was effective in improving bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
This study explores through evidence-based literature whether the use of smartphones can improve the effectiveness of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Based on the integration of evidence and the results of our clinical application, it shows that using smartphones for enhanced health education is feasible. It is convenient, quick, not limited by time or location, and can be viewed at any time, making it a cost-effective health education strategy. We plan to revise relevant procedures into outpatient workflow guidelines to achieve the goal of translating evidence-based knowledge into practice and implementing scientific evidence in nursing clinical practice and its promotion.