胸管移除時使用冰敷是否可有效降低病人疼痛程度The use of cold therapy for reducing pain following chest tube removal.

1556 3 198         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2022030013B/Text

2022-07-14 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

任育琪* 羅雅馨 鄭麗華

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

胸腔暨重症加護醫學 (Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine)  

治療/介入措施

臨床護理技術相關措施(Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques) - 冰敷

專長類別

心血管及胸腔

中文關鍵詞

#冰敷、移除胸管、疼痛

英文關鍵詞

#chest tube removal # cold therapy # pain

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人林口長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

內科第五加護病房

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
胸管移除時使用冰敷是否可有效降低病人疼痛程度? P:移除胸管、I:冰敷、C:無、O:疼痛程度。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
(一)文獻搜尋資料庫包含:Cochrane Database、Pubmed、Embase及Airiti Library華藝線上圖書館。 (二)關鍵字包含:P(chest tube removal、chest drain removal、胸管移除)、I(cold therapy 、cryotherapy、cold application、冰敷)、C(Non、無)、O (pain、疼痛程度),關鍵字和 PICO 符合,PICO 關鍵字順序:P&I→O→C,Combine text words/keywords/MeSH term 搜尋,使用布林字元”OR, AND, NOT”,篩選語言為中英文。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
搜尋結果:中英文文獻資料庫共39篇,其中排除非近五年、非SR或RCT文章、標題與摘要不符合、重複文獻,共評讀4篇,採用2020年CASP作為評讀工具,評分結果於7-9分之間;證據等級採用牛津大學實證中心所建議的臨床研究證據分級表,其中三篇為Level Ⅱ,一篇因無盲化且介入措施的效果不佳,故將證據等級降至Level Ⅲ。
證據之臨床應用:
運用實證知識轉譯之 7 步驟進行改善,推行同時進行結果分析,自2020年9月至2020年12月,於北部某醫學中心胸腔科病房,以冰敷為介入措施,於移除胸管前20分鐘協助傷口消毒,覆蓋乾淨紗布後,使用600g冰塊製作之冰敷袋,於胸管置入周圍冰敷20分鐘,再由總醫師於1-2分鐘內移除胸管,護理人員協助縫線傷口消毒及紗布覆蓋,並於胸管移除前20分鐘、期間及後10分鐘進行疼痛評估。
成效評值:
2020年9月至2020年12月,共納入20名胸管置入病人,胸管移除時有 冰敷組與無冰敷組的疼痛平均分數有顯著差異(mean score : 2.4 vs. 5.0; p< .001);胸管移除後10分鐘,有冰敷組與無冰敷組的疼痛平均分數也有顯著差異(mean score : 0.4 vs. 2.8; p< .001),經由統計分析結果發現介入冰敷措施,讓病人不論是在移除胸管時及移除後的疼痛分數,皆較無冰敷組的病人低。
結論與建議:
此篇旨探討胸管移除時使用冰敷是否可有效降低病人疼痛程度?透由實證查詢及臨床應用,形成PICO後利用實證醫學策略,搜尋並篩選相關文獻,並經嚴格評析4篇文獻,印證胸管移除前20分鐘進行冰敷對於緩解移除胸管疼痛之成效,臨床應用過程中未有不良反應之產生,且經由統計分析結果發現冰敷組與對照組之間,在移除胸管期間及後10分鐘之疼痛程度皆有所差異,臨床效益高,並期望造福更多胸管移除病人之疼痛不適程度。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Build up a clinical question: The use of cold therapy for reducing pain following chest tube removal. PICO - P: chest tube removal ; I: cold therapy ; C: Non ; O:pain.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
The literature searching database includes Cochrane Database, Pubmed, Embase, Airiti Library. Keywords are includes as follows: P(chest tube removal、chest drain removal), I(cold therapy 、cryotherapy、cold application), C(Non), O (pain). Keywords is corresponding with PICO , and the sequence of PICO keywords: ” P&I→O→C”; combine text words/keywords/MeSH term searching with Boolean characters “OR, AND, NOT ” ; the languages selected are Chinese and English.
Critical Appraisal:
Qualified critical appraisal of literature- the searching results: there are total 39 articles found in Chinese and English literature databases; by deducting and removing the literature with Non-recent five years, non-SR or RCT articles, titles and abstracts that do not match, duplicate documents, a total 4 articles of literature are being appraised ,with the appraising tool of CASP in the version of 2020, the scoring result is between 7-9 points; the evidence level adopts the clinical research evidence grading table recommended by Oxford CEBM, three of which are Level Ⅱ, and one is not blinded and the effect of interventional measures is not good, so the evidence is The level drops to Level Ⅲ.
Clinical Application of Evidence:
Use the 7 steps empirical knowledge translation to improve, implement and analyze the results at the same time, during the study period, from September 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; performed in the Chest ward of a medical center in northern Taiwan. The intervention is cold therapy, disinfect the wound 20 minutes before removing the chest tube. After covering with clean gauze, use an ice pack made of 600g ice cubes. Place the ice pack around the chest tube for 20 minutes, and then remove it by the chief physician within 1-2 minutes for the chest tube, the nursing staff assisted with suture wound disinfection and gauze coverage, and pain assessment was performed 20 minutes before, during and 10 minutes after the chest tube was removed.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
From September 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, a total of 20 patients with chest tube implantation were enrolled. There was a significant difference in the mean score of pain between the cold therapy group and the control group when the chest tube was removed (mean score: 2.4 vs. 5.0; p< .001); 10 minutes after the chest tube was removed, there was also a significant difference in the mean score of pain between the cold therapy group and the control group (mean score: 0.4 vs. 2.8; p< .001), which was found by statistical analysis. Interventional ice therapy, so that the patient's pain scores during and after the removal of the chest tube are lower than those in the control group.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
The purpose of this article is to explore whether cold therapy can reduce the pain of patients with chest tube removal? Through empirical inquiry and clinical application, after forming PICO, empirical medical strategies are used to search and screen relevant documents, and after rigorous analysis of 4 documents, it was confirmed that ice therapy 20 minutes before chest tube removal was effective in relieving the pain of chest tube removal, and there was no adverse reaction during clinical application. The pain scores during and 10 minutes after the chest tube is different, with high clinical benefit, and hope to benefit more patients with chest tube removal comfort.