外科術後病患留置導尿管移除前膀胱訓練是否可降低導尿管重置率Is bladder training before removing the indwelling Urinary Catheter reduce the re-catheterization rate in postoperative patients

5072 62 476         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2021020002A/Text

2021-06-07 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

張雅萱 許育綾 方宣雅 柳春霙 蔣宜倩*

文章類別

A 類:實證健康照護綜整

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

一般外科醫學 (General Surgery)  

治療/介入措施

臨床護理技術相關措施(Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques) -

專長類別

急重症暨手術護理

中文關鍵詞

#留置導尿管、膀胱訓練、導尿管重置率

英文關鍵詞

#Indwelling urinary catheter # Bladder training # Urinary re-catheterization rate

機構名稱

國泰醫療財團法人汐止國泰綜合醫院

申請單位

護理科

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
術後病患使用留置導尿管為常見的醫療處置,主要應用於病患尿量監測、避免尿滯留,及降低接受泌尿生殖系統或臨近器官手術後傷口汙染,以促進傷口癒合等情況。然而,針對術後病人移除導尿管前是否需要進行膀胱訓練目前尚無一致定論。曾有學者建議導尿管移除前,須進行膀胱訓練,以減少尿滯留及導尿管重置率。但膀胱訓練時,若時間掌控不善反而也可能導致病患泌尿道感染率的增加。實地觀察本院三個外科病房發現,對於術後放置留置導尿管的病患,於導尿管移除前的做法不盡相同。因此,本文主要目的為透過回顧文獻,了解留置導尿管移除前,膀胱訓練是否可降低外科術後病患導尿管重置率,以提供臨床醫療人員照護之實證參考。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
本文搜尋探討介入膀胱訓練措施於外科手術後置放留置導尿管病患之實證文獻。搜尋資料庫包含EBSCO、PubMed、Cochrane Library等3個電子文獻資料庫,使用關鍵字包含留置導尿管、膀胱訓練及導尿管重置率等進行搜尋。初步搜尋122篇,最後瀏覽摘要及內文,選擇符合納入條件的文獻,共納入1篇系統性回顧文獻及2篇隨機照試驗研究文獻進行分析。
文獻的品質評讀:
由二位研究者應用CASP- Systematic Review Checklist_2018,進行系統性回顧文獻評析,隨機對照試驗文獻分析則採用CASP- Randomized Control Trial Checklist_2018進行評析,文獻評讀結果顯示,三篇文獻符合評量項目為8-9項,最後採用Joanna Briggs Institute (2014)證據等級系統評讀證據等級,一篇系統性回顧文獻評定結果為證據等級1.b,二篇隨機對照試驗文獻評定結果為證據等級1.c。
結果、結論與建議:
本文應用系統性文獻回顧方式,探討膀胱訓練是否可降低外科術後病患導尿管重置率,根據三篇研究文獻查證之結果,發現主要研究結果皆顯示,針對手術後短期置放導尿管之患者而言,病患進行膀胱訓練與否,對於導尿管移除後的重置率、泌尿道感染發生機率,甚至是急性尿滯留的發生率,均無顯著差異存在。因此,建議醫院針對非泌尿道外科手術後短期置放導尿管之病患,停止進行膀胱訓練,也可進一步進行臨床實證護理研究,以更精確釐清適用族群,確認相關正面與負面之影響,以提供臨床醫療人員實務應用之參考,並提升病患安全,發揮最大醫療照護品質。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Postoperative patients commonly use indwelling urinary catheters to monitor urine output, reduce wound pollution, and avoid urine retention. However, there is no consensus on whether bladder training is necessary before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in postoperative patients. Bladder training before removal of the catheter has been reported to reduce the incidence of urinary retention and urinary re-catheterization rate. However, if inadequately control of the time of clamped urinary catheter, may increase the urinary tract infection rate. In our hospital, the procedures before the catheter removal were different for patients who placed indwelling catheters after surgery in the three surgical wards. Therefore, this article aims to review the literature to explore whether bladder training before removing the indwelling Urinary Catheter can reduce the re-catheterization rate in postoperative patients. The result of this article may provide an empirical reference for clinical practice.
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
This article searched for empirical articles that focused on the effectiveness of bladder training before removing the indwelling catheters in patients after surgery. The search database contained three electronic literature databases, including EBSCO, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. Searching keywords including “indwelling urinary catheter”, “bladder training”, and “urinary re-catheterization rate”. A total of 122 articles were initially extracted by the search criteria. After carefully reviewing the abstracts and texts of the manuscripts based on the inclusion criteria, 3 articles were recruited in this review, including 1 systematic review and 2 randomized controlled trials.
Critical Appraisal:
Two researchers conducted the critical appraisal of the manuscripts by using the CASP-Systematic Review Checklist_2018 for the systematic review article and the CASP- Randomized Control Trial Checklist_2018 for the articles of randomized controlled trials. The results complied with 8-9 items out of 10-11standard criteria. Then, the Joanna Briggs Institute levels of evidence was used for the reviewed literature. The results indicated systematic review article was rated as evidence level 1.b, and the randomized controlled trials articles were rated into evidence level 1.c.
Results, Conclusions and Recommendations:
This article used a systematic literature review method to explore whether the bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter can reduce the urinary re-catheterization rate in postoperative patients. The results of the 3 articles indicated there were no significant differences in the urinary re-catheterization rate, the risk of urinary tract infection, and acute urinary retention in post-operative patients whether they were using bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter or not. Therefore, it is suggested that bladder training is not necessary for patients with short-term catheter placement who are receiving surgery, except for urinary tract surgery. Further clinical empirical nursing research is needed to clarify the applicable populations and confirm related positive and negative effects of this strategy. The results of this article may provide useful knowledge to clinical practice to improve patient safety and the quality of health care.