全膝關節置換病人術前使用2% CHG皮膚準備降低手術部位感染之成效Effectiveness of skin preparation with 2% CHG in reducing surgical site infection in total knee arthroplasty patients

1756 4 263         DOI:doi.org/10.30131/TWNA_EBHC_Library.DB_2021080022B/Text

2022-05-20 已刊登
綜 整 預防/治療/介入類型

作  者

林秀蓉 曾夢如 許華娟 陳瓊伃 盧幸茹*

文章類別

B 類:實證健康照護應用

問題類型

治療/預防性問題

健康狀況

一般外科醫學 (General Surgery)  

治療/介入措施

臨床護理技術相關措施(Clinical Nursing Skills and Techniques) - 術前使用克菌寧洗澡

專長類別

急重症暨手術護理

中文關鍵詞

#全膝關節置換病人 #2% CHG #手術部位感染

英文關鍵詞

#Total Knee Arthroplasty #2% CHG #Surgical Wound Infection Rate.

機構名稱

長庚醫療財團法人嘉義長庚紀念醫院

申請單位

骨科病房

中文摘要

形成臨床提問:
手術部位感染(Surgical Site Infection, SSI)為常見醫療照護相關感染(Healthcare-Associated Infection, HAI)之一,(Chlorhexidine gluconate, CHG)是近年來被廣泛用於皮膚消毒溶液,故本文以實證來驗證術前使用2% CHG對於手術部位感染之成效,形成臨床問題為:「全膝關節置換病人術前使用2% CHG皮膚準備是否能降低手術部位感染率?」。
文獻搜尋的方法與分析:
透過 PICO 建立關鍵字及同義字,以布林邏輯原則,於 Cochrane library、PubMed、Embase及Airiti Library 華藝線上圖書館等資料庫進行搜索,共得20篇文獻,依納入及排除條件篩選後,選定1篇系統性文獻統合分析及1篇隨機對照試驗研究,以 CASP 針對有效性、重要性及應用性評析,並依據 2011 年 Oxford 證據分類標準來進行等級分類。
文獻的品質評讀與結果:
CASP 針對2篇文獻之有效性、重要性及應用性評讀,證據等級 依Oxford標準評定介於Level 1~2。2篇文獻皆是比較術前使用 2%CHG與優碘對SSI之成效:第 1 篇結論指出中、高風險者術前使用2%CHG皮膚準備可降低手術部位感染風險,分別為(p=.007)、(p=.014),第 2 篇亦是認同2% CHG能降低手術部位感染風險(p=.049)。
證據之臨床應用:
以實證步驟為基礎,運用實證知識轉譯之7步驟進行專案改善,選定本院骨科病房為推行地點、全膝關節置換病人為收案對象,收案時間自2020年01月15日至2021年03月31日,介入期間以 2%CHG皮膚準備為介入措施。
成效評值:
使用優碘皮膚準備302位病人的總感染率為1.7%、平均住院天數8.2天(SD=4.74),使用2% CHG皮膚準備411位病人的總感染率為0.2%、平均住院天數7.65天(SD=2.53),術後總感染率與住院天數皆達顯著差異(p< .05)。
結論與建議:
2% CHG能有效降低手術部位感染率、降低醫療成本支出、減少護理人員工時。希望此實證結果能提供其它醫療單位做參考,建議未來能以設計更嚴謹的隨機分組模式進行實驗研究,以確認膝關節置換術前2% CHG皮膚準備方案之成效。

英文摘要

Ask an answerable question (PICO):
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is one of the common healthcare-associated infections (HAI), and Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a solution that has been widely used in skin disinfection in recent years. The effect of preoperative use of 2% CHG on SSI leads to a clinical question: "Whether preoperative skin preparation with 2% CHG in total knee arthroplasty can reduce the rate of surgical site infection?".
The Method and Analysis of Literature Review:
Creating keywords and synonyms through PICO, and searching in Cochrane library, PubMed, Embase and Airiti Library Huayi online library and other databases based on the principle of Boolean logic, a total of 20 documents were obtained. According to the inclusion and exclusion conditions, one systematic literature meta-analysis and one randomized controlled trial were selected. CASP was used to evaluate the effectiveness, importance, and applicability. Based on the 2011 Oxford Evidence Classification Criteria, the literatures were also graded.
Critical Appraisal:
CASP evaluates the validity, importance and applicability of the two literatures, and the level of evidence is between Level 1-2 in the light of the Oxford standard. Both literatures compare the use of 2% CHG and betadine before surgery on postoperative wound infection. The first conclusion indicated that preoperative use of 2% CHG skin preparation could reduce the risk of postoperative wound infection in moderate and high-risk patients, respectively (p=.007) and (p=.014), and the second was also agreed that 2% CHG could reduce the risk of postoperative wound infection (p=.049).
Clinical Application of Evidence:
Evidence-based on the empirical steps, use the 7 steps of empirical knowledge translation to improve the project. The orthopaedic ward of our hospital is selected as the implementation site, and the patients with total knee replacement are the subjects to receive the case. On March 31st, 2% CHG skin preparation was used as the intervention measure during the intervention period.
Evaluation of Effectiveness:
The overall infection rate of 302 patients treated with betadine skin preparation was 1.7% and the mean hospital stay was 8.2 days (SD = 4.74). The overall infection rate of 411 patients treated with 2% CHG skin preparation was 0.2% and the mean hospital stay was 7.65 days( SD=2.53). The total postoperative infection rate and the length of hospital stay were significantly different (p < .05).
Conclusions and Recommendations:
Pre-surgical skin preparation with 2% CHG can effectively reduce surgical site infection rates, healthcare costs, and working hours of nursing staff. This result could be possibly provided to other medical units as reference. It is suggested that a more rigorously designed randomization model can be used to conduct experimental studies in the future to confirm the effectiveness of the 2% CHG skin preparation regimen before knee arthroplasty.